Not contesting the IRDR and the appeal of the applicability of the legal thesis

implications and systematization required

Authors

  • Vinicius Silva Lemos UNICAP/PE

Keywords:

Incident, Repetitive Demands, stabilization, Exceptional Feature

Abstract

This article has the purpose to analyze the issue of resolution of repetitive demands and the possibility of appeal of its decision on the merits, through the legal content of art. 987 and the provision on scope of exceptional features and the possibility of legitimized not impugn the fault, with the stabilization of the thesis. With the applicability of the precedent in the processes that are affected and futures, they will be eligible for resources and the purpose of this study is to discuss the conduct of this exceptional impugnable of decision in which the legal theory is applied and the need of systematization of their impacts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Vinicius Silva Lemos, UNICAP/PE

Lawyer. Phd student in Procedural Law by UNICAP/PE. Master’s degree in Sociology and Law from the UFF/RJ. Specialist in Civil Procedure by FARO. Professor of Civil Procedure in FARO and the UNIRON. Coordinator of the Graduate Program in Civil Procedure Of Uninter/FAP. Vice-president of the Institute of procedural law of Rondônia – IDPR. Director General of ESA/RO. Member of the North-northeast Association of Teachers of Process - ANNEP. Member of the Center for Advanced Studies in the process - CEAPRO. Member of the Brazilian Association of procedural law - ABDPRO. Member of the Brazilian Institute of procedural law - IBDP.

Published

2018-08-15

How to Cite

LEMOS, Vinicius Silva. Not contesting the IRDR and the appeal of the applicability of the legal thesis: implications and systematization required. Civil Procedure Review, [S. l.], v. 9, n. 2, p. 131–164, 2018. Disponível em: https://civilprocedurereview.com/revista/article/view/175. Acesso em: 23 nov. 2024.

Issue

Section

Artigos